Skip to content
Radiant Running Review

Editorial policy

Radiant Running Review aims to make running topics clear, useful and fair. We distinguish explanation from opinion, take care with factual claims and make changes when a published detail needs correction.

Accuracy and clarity

We check names, terminology and factual statements before publication, and we review a piece for clarity as well as correctness. We do not present estimates or personal viewpoints as established facts. When a topic depends on individual circumstances, we make that limit clear rather than offering a universal answer.

Independence and partnerships

Editorial decisions remain separate from commercial arrangements. A partnership does not guarantee coverage, a favourable opinion or control over our editorial conclusions. Sponsored or partner material is labelled clearly so readers can distinguish it from independent editorial coverage.

Corrections

If you spot an error, contact us with the article title and the detail in question. We assess correction requests and amend factual errors when warranted. Where a change materially affects the meaning of a piece, we make the correction clear to readers.

Illustrations

Some illustrations may be AI-generated. Illustrations are there to support the page, not to serve as evidence that an event, person or product exists. We aim to avoid imagery that could be mistaken for documentary proof.

Our point of view

A run is shaped before the first step

The route, the reason for going and the habits around a run all matter. We make those choices easier to see without pretending there is one right way to run.

About the review